LogoLogo
  • Imua
    • About
  • Manifesto
    • The Problems
    • The Principles
  • Architecture
    • Imua Design Principles
    • Imua Network
    • Imua Modules
    • Client Chain Bridges
      • Trustless Verification of Client Chain State
      • Handling Race Conditions between Imua and Client Chains
    • Client Chain Contracts
  • Concepts
    • Ecosystem
      • Re/stakers
      • Operators
      • Services (AVS)
        • Service Integration with Imua
        • Service Committee
        • Service Integration Details
    • restaked Proof-of-Stake (rPOS)
    • Multi-Token Restaking
    • Multi-Chain Restaking with Trustless Bridging
    • Voting Power
    • Price Oracle
    • Flexible Integration with AVS
    • Tribe Staking
  • Governance
  • Risk Management
    • Risk Analysis
      • Risk Modeling
      • Risk Parameters
      • Crypto-Economic Risk
      • Unintended Slashing
      • Black Swan Events
    • Risk Mitigation
      • Smart Contract Simplicity
      • Audits
      • Slashing Prevention
      • Slashing Vetos
      • Insurance Pools
      • Circuit Breakers
  • Components
    • Testnet
    • Oracle Module
      • Reaching Consensus on Asset Prices
      • Penalty
      • Implementation Detail
    • Smart Contracts
    • Explorer
    • Registry
  • Validator Setup
    • Prerequisites
    • Node Install
    • Compiling Binary from Source
    • Oracle Price Feeder
    • Running the Node
    • Snapshot
    • Register Option 1 (Bootstrap)
    • Register Option 2 (Post Network Launch)
    • Deposit Tokens
    • Delegating Tokens
    • Confirm Election Status
    • Faucets
    • Managing The Validator
    • Security Best Practices
    • Risks & Mitigation
    • Participation in Governance
    • FAQs & Resources
    • Testnet v7 to v8 upgrade
  • Testnet Upgrade to v1.1.1
  • AVS Setup
    • AVS Overview
    • Prerequisites
    • Building the AVS in Imua
    • Hello-World-AVS Example
    • Becoming AVS Operator
    • AVS Register and Deploy
    • AVS Task Example
    • Enhanced and Automated Edition of hello-avs integration guide&example
  • Whitepaper (2023)
    • .pdf
  • FAQ
    • What problems is Imua solving?
    • What are the main design trade-offs that had to be made with an omnichain design?
    • Does the omnichain design imply added trust assumptions (relative to a single-chain design)?
    • What concurrency-related challenges would you face with a different design?
    • How does Imua integrate with new chains?
    • Do specific chains prove unique challenges w.r.t. integration?
    • How is the cross-chain communication is achieved?
    • What are the known attack / censorship vectors here, if any?
    • Are the restaked tokens being pooled in a centralized account?
    • Who will run the validators in the Imua network?
    • Is Imua an AVS?
    • How does Imua address the risks of overloading L1 social consensus?
    • Does the Imua queuing system raise concerns around latency?
    • What are the main benefits of an omnichain design?
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Architecture
  2. Client Chain Bridges

Handling Race Conditions between Imua and Client Chains

Imua integrates with multiple blockchains, each of which can simultaneously exchange messages with Imua. It’s essential to prevent potential race conditions to ensure data consistency across all systems.

The solution to these challenges is twofold: 1) maintain distinct user accounts between client chains and 2) enforce sequential message processing for each client chain.

Firstly, user accounts are uniquely identified by the combination of chain_id and user_address. This means there isn’t a multi-chain account; instead, only single-chain accounts exist. Users with accounts across multiple chains are regarded as distinct users within the Imua system, with each account conducting staking independently.

Moreover, every message exchanged between a client chain and Imua includes a nonce and the chain ID, which dictates the processing sequence on the recipient’s end and prevents message replay attacks from multiple chains.

Message processing logic is implemented in such a way that all error cases are handled gracefully. Messages are either successfully processed or fail to process. Failed messages are queued for retry, which is guaranteed to succeed eventually, ensuring no disruption in subsequent message processing.

For specific actions, like deposits and delegations from the client chain, a response message from Imua provides feedback on whether the action was successfully executed. This response also updates the client chain’s state, ensuring that certain accounting details remain consistent between Imua and the client chain.

PreviousTrustless Verification of Client Chain StateNextClient Chain Contracts

Last updated 15 days ago